DOCVIT News | Director Liu Guangchao was Invited to Attend the 2017 SFI Annual Conference & The Bund Summit on FinTech

Source:   Time: 2017-07-11 11:28:49  Author:

preamble: On July 8 through 9, 2017, the 7th SFI Annual Conference & The 4th Bund Summit on FinTech was held in Shanghai. Liu Guangchao, Director of Beijing DOCVIT Law Firm and secretary general of Green Legal Global Alliance, attended the summit as a specially invited guest, and participated in discussion and communication. This Summit was hosted by Shanghai Finance Institute (SFI) with the theme of Technology-Driven Global Financial Transformation; National Internet Finance Association of China (NIFA), China Finance 40 Forum (CF40) and Institute of Digital Finance, Peking University (IDF) provided academic support.


The Summit gathered Li Dongrong, CF40 Executive Director and Chairman of NIFA, Jiang Jianqing, SFI Chairman and Board Chairman of China-Central and Eastern Europe Investment Cooperation Fund, Xie Ping, CF40 Vice Chairman of Executive Board of Directors and CF40 Senior Research Fellow, Huang Yiping, Chairman of SFI Academic Committee and Director of IDF, Xu Zhong, CF40 member and Director-General of PBOC Research Bureau, Zhong Wei, SFI Academic Member and Vice President of SFI, Wan Jianhua, Chairman of SFI Board of Supervisors and Chairman of Association of Shanghai Internet Financial Industry, Sun Guofeng, CF40 member and Director-General of PBOC School of Finance and other regulatory leaders, business community executives and academic experts, which conducted the high-end dialogue around a series of hot issues like Fintech, Regtech, inclusive financial system, robo-advisor, digital currency and block chain.

The Submit included multiple forms like keynote speech, round-table discussion and closed-door seminar. The participants exchanged their views on the FinTech supported new practice of inclusive financial system, the route of integrating commercial banks and FinTech, international Regtech experience and multinational cooperation, P2P industry transition in the post-regulation era, the prospect and challenges of AI in the financial field, innovation and influence of digital currency and block chain. They identified the essence of financial development, foresaw the future of digital finance development and discussed the status quo and development trend of Fintech both at home and abroad.

Huang Yiping, Chairman of CF40 & SFI Academic Committee and Director of IDF said that, now, most of digital financial institutions conduct mixed operation, and generally set foot in insurance, fund, securities, bank and other comprehensive business; FinTech companies that have obtained the “full license” even appeared; so, the conventional separate regulation under the Peoples Bank of China, China Banking Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission and China Insurance Regulatory cannot adapt to such situation. But, the financial regulation system reform cannot be accomplished at one stroke; thus, before changing the separate regulation framework, it may consider the first establishment of a digital finance regulator across the Peoples Bank of China, China Banking Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission and China Insurance Regulatory.”

Li Dongrong, CF40 Executive Director and Chairman of NIFA, commented on the current hot topic of FinTech regulation. He said that, it should well control appropriate balance between FinTech innovation and risk regulation, implement the innovative regulation, positively explore the applicability and feasibility of new regulatory means like Regtech and regulatory sandbox in China, let FinTech innovation be operable, feasible and properly applied, and let the regulators be seen, read and well control the FinTech innovation.”

Jiang Jianqing, SFI Chairman and Board Chairman of China-Central and Eastern Europe Investment Cooperation Fund, delivered a keynote speech with the theme of “Rectifying the Name of FinTech”. He said that, FinTech represented by cloud computing, mobile Internet, block chain and AI is booming, and financial innovation is thriving. It has entered a new stage deeply integrating finance and technology, posing challenges to conventional financial operation modes, even the intermediary function. In the meantime, financial institutions have tremendous changes, and have fulfilled the industrialized and intensive operation by means of FinTech, which improves the efficiency and reduces the cost. The new financial market pattern is in a stage of big change, integration and evolvement.”

Sun Guofeng, CF40 member and Director-General of PBOC School of Finance, delivered a keynote speech with the theme of “Chinas RegTech Development Path”. He said that, in a broad sense, RegTech may be defined as “organic combination of technology and regulation”, i.e. applying technology in regulation. RegTech covers three subjects: the first is the regulators, responsible for formulating the regulatory rules; the second is financial institutions, including FinTech companies, the behaviors of which need to meet the regulatory compliant requirement; the third is RegTech companies, which may be financial institutions; and FinTech companies should provide services meeting the regulatory compliant requirement. To be specific, such emerging technologies as big data, cloud computing, AI and machine learning can be applied.”

 

May be interested

Professional Team
Professional Interpretation
More
  • Preventing corporate governance risks under new Company Law2024-07-03
    The new Company Law promotes the transformation of corporate governance from shareholder primacy to director primacy. This imposes governance responsibility on entrepreneurs such as directors, supervisors, officers (DSOs) and actual controllers of a company, increasing their risk of performing duties with their personal property at stake. Therefore, reducing the risk of entrepreneurs and their families facing compensation over corporate governance is of great concern.
  • How to deal with the failures to fulfill duty of diligence?2021-10-25
    Both party A and party B are shareholders of company a, with a accounting for 30% of the shares and B for a state-owned enterprise holding company, accounting for 50% of the shares. Mr. Li is a director appointed by company B to company a, and also the head of financial department of company A. At the beginning of 2021, party A learned that there was still 1 million yuan of capital contribution of company B due but not paid in, and Mr. Li never called on company B according to his duty when he clearly learned that company B did not fulfill his obligation of capital contribution. In addition, Li used his authority to change the management authority of company A's office system, adjust the relevant processes and procedures of the company's internal management, and put pressure on the employees without reason, resulting in the failure of company A's normal operation for three consecutive months. In view of Li's behavior, how should company a and shareholders a protect the rights and interests of the company and themselves?
  • Voting rights can be restricted if shareholders fail to invest?2021-08-24
    In recent years, the competition for corporate control has become more and more intense. The form of competition is no longer confined to the background, but gradually moved to the stage. In order to fight for corporate control, the disputes about the representation of corporate will caused by the internal power struggle in commercial cases are increasing. Voting right has also become the focus of contention among shareholders. If they fail to fulfill the obligation of capital contribution on schedule, there are serious differences among shareholders about whether their voting right can be limited. In the absence of special provisions in the articles of association, should shareholders vote according to the proportion of paid in capital contribution or the proportion of subscribed capital contribution?
About DOCVIT
More
Beijing Docvit Law Firm (Docvit in short), which was established in 2003, is one of the few earliest law firms instituted as a corporation rather than partnership in China. Aimed at building a high quality law firm with professional competence, Docvit fostered innovation under its unique system of operating as a large-scale corporation. Benefited with its core-competitiveness, such as international insights and full IT application management mode, to name some of them, Docvit pursued cross-border development and established an image of high-end brand in a industrialized market. In 2015, Docvit was ushered into a “3.0 era” of moderate-scale development, which witnessed the gradual formation of nation-wide and world-wide layout with the start-up of branch offices in Tianjin, Jinan, Shenzhen, Shanghai, Chengdu, Taiyuan, Hong Kong, London and other places in succession.
Brand Activity
More
Honors
More
Over the years, business and brand of DOCVIT have matured and won the "Special Contribution Award of All China Lawyers Association", "Excellent Law Firm in Beijing", "Excellent Law Firm in Chaoyang District", ALB2016 Asia Top Ten Elite Law Firm, 2018 Outstanding Law Firm Award by China Business Law Journal, etc.