DOCVIT News | Director Liu Guangchao Attended the Expert Seminar of China Women’s Development Foundation and Was Appointed As the Professional Adviser of Expert Think Tank

Source:   Time: 2017-07-04 11:26:17  Author:

preamble: In the morning of July 3, 2017, China Womens Development Foundation (CWDF) held the expert seminar in Beijing. Chairman Meng Xiaosi attended and delivered a speech in the meeting. Relevant leaders and experts conducted discussion around the Strategic Development Plan Report of China Womens Development Foundation (2016-2020). Director Liu Guangchao of DOCVIT Law Firm was invited to attend the seminar and appointed as the professional adviser of its expert think tank.

In the seminar, Director Liu Guangchao delivered a speech regarding CWDFs social contribution, overall layout of the plan report and relevant issues. He said that, First, I would like to express my sincere respect to CWDF which is a glorious banner, a special field, a holy undertaking and a noble feeling in China’s women work; second, with the highly-positioned theme and solid content, the strategic plan development report makes summarization and deployment from the political height, theories and culture, branding, IT building, governance structure, resources integration, talent cultivation and other aspects; last but not least, regarding DOCVIT’s support of CWDF, it is proposed to carry out cooperation centering on “establishing a kind of strategic cooperation relation, conducting all-round legal summarization, providing a series of targeted training and studying one major representative subject”, and it is hoped that DOCVIT can make contribution to the development of CWDF.”

In consideration of the contribution of Director Liu Guangchao in the professional field as well as his continuous concern and support of philanthropy, China Womens Development Foundation appointed Director Liu Guangchao to be the professional adviser of expert think tank, and issued a letter of appointment.

 

May be interested

Professional Team
Professional Interpretation
More
  • How to deal with the failures to fulfill duty of diligence?2021-10-25
    Both party A and party B are shareholders of company a, with a accounting for 30% of the shares and B for a state-owned enterprise holding company, accounting for 50% of the shares. Mr. Li is a director appointed by company B to company a, and also the head of financial department of company A. At the beginning of 2021, party A learned that there was still 1 million yuan of capital contribution of company B due but not paid in, and Mr. Li never called on company B according to his duty when he clearly learned that company B did not fulfill his obligation of capital contribution. In addition, Li used his authority to change the management authority of company A's office system, adjust the relevant processes and procedures of the company's internal management, and put pressure on the employees without reason, resulting in the failure of company A's normal operation for three consecutive months. In view of Li's behavior, how should company a and shareholders a protect the rights and interests of the company and themselves?
  • Voting rights can be restricted if shareholders fail to invest?2021-08-24
    In recent years, the competition for corporate control has become more and more intense. The form of competition is no longer confined to the background, but gradually moved to the stage. In order to fight for corporate control, the disputes about the representation of corporate will caused by the internal power struggle in commercial cases are increasing. Voting right has also become the focus of contention among shareholders. If they fail to fulfill the obligation of capital contribution on schedule, there are serious differences among shareholders about whether their voting right can be limited. In the absence of special provisions in the articles of association, should shareholders vote according to the proportion of paid in capital contribution or the proportion of subscribed capital contribution?
  • How to solve the deadlock caused by shareholders' contradiction?2021-07-27
    Party A, Party B and Party C established company a in 2008, holding 51%, 45% and 4% shares respectively. In 2018, due to policy adjustment, the main business of company a could not continue to operate. Party A, Party B and Party C held shareholders' meetings on the transformation and development direction of company a for many times, but Party A and Party B could not reach an agreement. Up to now, the development of the company has been stagnant, How can companies get out of trouble?
About DOCVIT
More
Beijing Docvit Law Firm (Docvit in short), which was established in 2003, is one of the few earliest law firms instituted as a corporation rather than partnership in China. Aimed at building a high quality law firm with professional competence, Docvit fostered innovation under its unique system of operating as a large-scale corporation. Benefited with its core-competitiveness, such as international insights and full IT application management mode, to name some of them, Docvit pursued cross-border development and established an image of high-end brand in a industrialized market. In 2015, Docvit was ushered into a “3.0 era” of moderate-scale development, which witnessed the gradual formation of nation-wide and world-wide layout with the start-up of branch offices in Tianjin, Jinan, Shenzhen, Shanghai, Chengdu, Taiyuan, Hong Kong, London and other places in succession.
Brand Activity
More
Honors
More
Over the years, business and brand of DOCVIT have matured and won the "Special Contribution Award of All China Lawyers Association", "Excellent Law Firm in Beijing", "Excellent Law Firm in Chaoyang District", ALB2016 Asia Top Ten Elite Law Firm, 2018 Outstanding Law Firm Award by China Business Law Journal, etc.