News

    1. Home
    2. Information and Activity / News
    DOCVIT News | Director Liu Guangchao and Lawyer Shi Guanghu were Invited to Teach the International Project Equipment and Materials Guarantee Training Seminar of PowerChina Limited

    Source:   Time: 2017-09-25 11:41:45  Author:

    Abstract: On September 20, 2017, at the invitation of PowerChina Limited, Director Liu Guangchao and Senior Partner Lawyer Shi Guanghu of Beijing DOCVIT Law Firm provided the special training of Purchase Contract Management and Prevention and Control of Legal Risks for the International Project Equipment and Materials Guarantee Training Seminar of PowerChina Limited.


    In the seminar, Director Liu Guangchao said that, “the international projects undertaken by domestic enterprises are inevitably restricted by local governmental laws, regulations, custom, culture, market environment and other factors, so the management of equipment and materials in the international projects would encounter corresponding difficulties in practice.” Then, Director Liu Guangchao analyzed the problems in the enterprises’ management of equipment and materials of international projects and gave relevant proposals.

    In addition, Lawyer Shi Guanghu delivered a keynote speech of Purchase Contract Management and Prevention and Control of Legal Risks in the seminar. He conducted discussion and exchange with the participants around the requirement and implementation of centralized purchase management of group companies in the new situation, purchase contract management and prevention and control of risks, analyses and risks control of the export rebates policies as well as other issues.

    This International Project Equipment and Materials Guarantee Training Seminar of PowerChina Limited lasted three days and was widely recognized by the participants.

     

    Relevant Recommendation

    May be interested

    Professional Team
    Professional Interpretation
    More
    • How to deal with the failures to fulfill duty of diligence?2021-10-25
      Both party A and party B are shareholders of company a, with a accounting for 30% of the shares and B for a state-owned enterprise holding company, accounting for 50% of the shares. Mr. Li is a director appointed by company B to company a, and also the head of financial department of company A. At the beginning of 2021, party A learned that there was still 1 million yuan of capital contribution of company B due but not paid in, and Mr. Li never called on company B according to his duty when he clearly learned that company B did not fulfill his obligation of capital contribution. In addition, Li used his authority to change the management authority of company A's office system, adjust the relevant processes and procedures of the company's internal management, and put pressure on the employees without reason, resulting in the failure of company A's normal operation for three consecutive months. In view of Li's behavior, how should company a and shareholders a protect the rights and interests of the company and themselves?
    • Voting rights can be restricted if shareholders fail to invest?2021-08-24
      In recent years, the competition for corporate control has become more and more intense. The form of competition is no longer confined to the background, but gradually moved to the stage. In order to fight for corporate control, the disputes about the representation of corporate will caused by the internal power struggle in commercial cases are increasing. Voting right has also become the focus of contention among shareholders. If they fail to fulfill the obligation of capital contribution on schedule, there are serious differences among shareholders about whether their voting right can be limited. In the absence of special provisions in the articles of association, should shareholders vote according to the proportion of paid in capital contribution or the proportion of subscribed capital contribution?
    • How to solve the deadlock caused by shareholders' contradiction?2021-07-27
      Party A, Party B and Party C established company a in 2008, holding 51%, 45% and 4% shares respectively. In 2018, due to policy adjustment, the main business of company a could not continue to operate. Party A, Party B and Party C held shareholders' meetings on the transformation and development direction of company a for many times, but Party A and Party B could not reach an agreement. Up to now, the development of the company has been stagnant, How can companies get out of trouble?
    About DOCVIT
    More
    Beijing Docvit Law Firm (Docvit in short), which was established in 2003, is one of the few earliest law firms instituted as a corporation rather than partnership in China. Aimed at building a high quality law firm with professional competence, Docvit fostered innovation under its unique system of operating as a large-scale corporation. Benefited with its core-competitiveness, such as international insights and full IT application management mode, to name some of them, Docvit pursued cross-border development and established an image of high-end brand in a industrialized market. In 2015, Docvit was ushered into a “3.0 era” of moderate-scale development, which witnessed the gradual formation of nation-wide and world-wide layout with the start-up of branch offices in Tianjin, Jinan, Shenzhen, Shanghai, Chengdu, Taiyuan, Hong Kong, London and other places in succession.
    Performance
    More
    Brand Activity
    More
    Honors
    More
    Over the years, business and brand of DOCVIT have matured and won the "Special Contribution Award of All China Lawyers Association", "Excellent Law Firm in Beijing", "Excellent Law Firm in Chaoyang District", ALB2016 Asia Top Ten Elite Law Firm, 2018 Outstanding Law Firm Award by China Business Law Journal, etc.