Docvit News| Mills & Reeve Law Firm, A Well-Known British Law Firm, Visited Docvit Law Firm

Source: Beijing DOCVIT Law Firm  Time: 2019-04-04 22:11:12  Author: Beijing DOCVIT Law Firm

Abstract: On March 27, 2019, Mr. Nick Finlayson-Brown, a well-known British law firm, Mills & Reeve, visited Beijing Docvit Law Firm. Lawyer Liu Guangchao, Director of Beijing Docvit Law Firm, Senior Consultant Xi Xiaohong, Partner Ms Chen Fengxia, Mr Bao Xiaohua attended the ceremony. The two sides held talks and exchanges on issues such as the Chinese and English legal service market and business layout, and reached consensus on future cooperation.

First of all, Director Liu welcomed Mr. Nick Finlayson-Brown, Mr. Robert Weatherley and Mr. Matthew Liston. At the symposium, Director Liu introduced the development history, business layout and establishment of branches domestic and abroad to the guests. Director Liu said that in the next step, Docvit will start the preparation and landing of the offices in Hong Kong, New York, Los Angeles, London, Singapore. In addition, Director Liu introduced the professional research results and information construction achievements of the law firm in recent years, as well as the basic situation of the Docvit international business team.

Nick Finlayson-Brown is the Director of the Cambridge Office and the Director of the China Business Center of Mills & Reeve. During the conversation, Mr. Brown introduced the basic situation of Mills & Reeve Law Firm. He said that Mills & Reeve is the largest law firm in the UK with more than 1,000 employees and six offices in the UK. The field covers corporate business, mergers and acquisitions, intellectual property, real estate, life sciences and related high-tech industry legal services, and clients are giant companies such as Microsoft, Apple, Alibaba, Samsung and other well-known companies. Mr. Brown expressed his desire to establish a partnership with Docvit and to communicate with Docvit International Business Unit. He is looking forward to the cooperation of joint legal affairs of the two parties in the UK and Europe, especially cross-border investment M&A and high-net-worth clients.

At the symposium, the two sides conducted in-depth discussions on the direction of future cooperation and reached a partnership.

Mills & Reeve LLP

Founded in 1789, Mills & Reeve LLP is one of the largest law firms in the UK with more than 1,000 employees and branches in nine cities including Birmingham, Cambridge, Leeds, London, Manchester and Norwich. Engineering, real estate, corporate business, financial business, high-tech and life sciences, family wealth management and other sectors cover all areas of commercial legal services. Mills & Reeve LLP has been named the UK's 100 best companies for 15 consecutive years, 2017 It earned 100 million pounds, won 28 awards in Chambers in 2018, and was named the UK's annual law firm in 2018.

Docvit International Business Unit

In the decades of development, Docvit’s key development in the cross-border legal services market is unique among domestic law firms. Docvit has extensive professional legal services experience in dealing with domestic and foreign dispute resolution, overseas listing, international mergers and acquisitions and international engineering, corporate governance, foreign investment in China, commercial law business such as due diligence, family office business and international financing. In the process of internationalization, our international service quality is highly recognized and deeply trusted by domestic and foreign customers. We have a unique understanding of overseas culture and thinking method, which provides us with a truly first-class cross-border legal service for domestic and foreign clients. Docvit International unit is proud of its international vision and high-level professionals to help clients avoid cross-border trading risks and achieve their investment goals.

May be interested

Professional Team
Professional Interpretation
More
  • How to deal with the failures to fulfill duty of diligence?2021-10-25
    Both party A and party B are shareholders of company a, with a accounting for 30% of the shares and B for a state-owned enterprise holding company, accounting for 50% of the shares. Mr. Li is a director appointed by company B to company a, and also the head of financial department of company A. At the beginning of 2021, party A learned that there was still 1 million yuan of capital contribution of company B due but not paid in, and Mr. Li never called on company B according to his duty when he clearly learned that company B did not fulfill his obligation of capital contribution. In addition, Li used his authority to change the management authority of company A's office system, adjust the relevant processes and procedures of the company's internal management, and put pressure on the employees without reason, resulting in the failure of company A's normal operation for three consecutive months. In view of Li's behavior, how should company a and shareholders a protect the rights and interests of the company and themselves?
  • Voting rights can be restricted if shareholders fail to invest?2021-08-24
    In recent years, the competition for corporate control has become more and more intense. The form of competition is no longer confined to the background, but gradually moved to the stage. In order to fight for corporate control, the disputes about the representation of corporate will caused by the internal power struggle in commercial cases are increasing. Voting right has also become the focus of contention among shareholders. If they fail to fulfill the obligation of capital contribution on schedule, there are serious differences among shareholders about whether their voting right can be limited. In the absence of special provisions in the articles of association, should shareholders vote according to the proportion of paid in capital contribution or the proportion of subscribed capital contribution?
  • How to solve the deadlock caused by shareholders' contradiction?2021-07-27
    Party A, Party B and Party C established company a in 2008, holding 51%, 45% and 4% shares respectively. In 2018, due to policy adjustment, the main business of company a could not continue to operate. Party A, Party B and Party C held shareholders' meetings on the transformation and development direction of company a for many times, but Party A and Party B could not reach an agreement. Up to now, the development of the company has been stagnant, How can companies get out of trouble?
About DOCVIT
More
Beijing Docvit Law Firm (Docvit in short), which was established in 2003, is one of the few earliest law firms instituted as a corporation rather than partnership in China. Aimed at building a high quality law firm with professional competence, Docvit fostered innovation under its unique system of operating as a large-scale corporation. Benefited with its core-competitiveness, such as international insights and full IT application management mode, to name some of them, Docvit pursued cross-border development and established an image of high-end brand in a industrialized market. In 2015, Docvit was ushered into a “3.0 era” of moderate-scale development, which witnessed the gradual formation of nation-wide and world-wide layout with the start-up of branch offices in Tianjin, Jinan, Shenzhen, Shanghai, Chengdu, Taiyuan, Hong Kong, London and other places in succession.
Brand Activity
More
Honors
More
Over the years, business and brand of DOCVIT have matured and won the "Special Contribution Award of All China Lawyers Association", "Excellent Law Firm in Beijing", "Excellent Law Firm in Chaoyang District", ALB2016 Asia Top Ten Elite Law Firm, 2018 Outstanding Law Firm Award by China Business Law Journal, etc.