News

    1. Home
    2. Information and Activity / News
    DOCVIT NEWS | MR. Xi Xiaohong officially joined DOCVIT serving as the Senior Consultant

    Source: Beijing DOCVIT Law Firm  Time: 2019-03-25 22:45:42  Author: Beijing DOCVIT Law Firm

    In March 2019, Mr. Xi Xiaohong, a famous person in legal profession, officially joined Beijing DOCVIT Law Firm serving as a senior consultant.

    Mr. Xi Xiaohong obtained a Bachelor of Arts (British Language and Literature) from Peking University in 1985; a Master of Laws (International Economic Law) from Peking University in 1988 and passed the National Bar Examination in the same year; He obtained the Bachelor of Arts (Law) and Master of Arts (Law) from the University of Cambridge in 1993 and 1997 respectively, and he became the first mainland Chinese student to earn an undergraduate degree in law from the University of Cambridge since 1949. He is also the first Chinese lawyer to study law at the University of Cambridge.

    Mr. Xi is qualified as a Chinese lawyer and has working experience in a Hong Kong law firm. He is the first Chinese lawyer to join DuPont in the United States. He has served as a senior legal advisor to DuPont's Asia Pacific region; he is the general counsel/CEO of the Fortune 500 central state-owned enterprise named China National Chemical Corporation, and he concurrently serves as the general counsel of China National Chemical Agrochemical Corporation and the first inhouse counsel of China Everbright Group Co., Ltd. as well as many other important titles.

    Mr. Xi Xiaohong has been nominated by Chambers for the first “China General Counsel for Best Achievement Award” in the legal field; DuPont’s highest global law award “Golden Eagle Award”; two top awards “Chief Executive Officer Outstanding Staff Award" from Hong Kong Airport Authority; General Manager Awards from China Chemical Industry Corporation and many other honors.

    Mr. Xi has deep experience in legal services in cross-border mergers and acquisitions, international investment and engineering, cross-jurisdictional dispute resolution, new energy, anti-dumping and other business areas. Mr. Xi Xiaohong has participated in and led the cross-jurisdictional mediation, arbitration, litigation, liquidation, bankruptcy and other dispute resolution cases and won the victory; some cases involve hundreds of millions of dollars, some of which involve transnational and cross-jurisdictional mediation, arbitration and litigation, and the economic losses he recovered for the enterprise accumulated in billions of dollars.

    Mr. Xi Xiaohong has participated in a number of national, regional and/or global investment and M&A projects with a total amount of more than US$10 billion. Mr. Xi helped a NASDAQ company to develop its business and multi-jurisdictional legal strategy and successful- ly obtained injunctions in multi-jurisdictions in a 400 million US dollar polysilicon wafer supply agreement dispute. This was the only winning case in the global photovoltaic industry in respect of supply agreement dispute. Mr. Xi initiated, led and won an anti-dumping case for the national PET films industry in PRC against Korean PET films manufacturers, the first successful anti-dumping case of the petrochemical industry in China with FIE as one of the petitioners. In addition, Mr. Xi Xiaohong has extensive experience in corporate governance, compliance and risk control.

    Beijing DOCVIT Law Firm has always been committed to creating a platform for cross-border integration, openness, inclusiveness, and win-win cooperation. The joining of Mr. Xi Xiaohong will play an important role in DOCVIT's development in deepening of the industry market and the crossover practice, further strengthen DOCVIT's comprehensive strength in related business areas, and provide clients with better high-end legal services.
    Relevant Recommendation

    May be interested

    Professional Team
    Professional Interpretation
    More
    • How to deal with the failures to fulfill duty of diligence?2021-10-25
      Both party A and party B are shareholders of company a, with a accounting for 30% of the shares and B for a state-owned enterprise holding company, accounting for 50% of the shares. Mr. Li is a director appointed by company B to company a, and also the head of financial department of company A. At the beginning of 2021, party A learned that there was still 1 million yuan of capital contribution of company B due but not paid in, and Mr. Li never called on company B according to his duty when he clearly learned that company B did not fulfill his obligation of capital contribution. In addition, Li used his authority to change the management authority of company A's office system, adjust the relevant processes and procedures of the company's internal management, and put pressure on the employees without reason, resulting in the failure of company A's normal operation for three consecutive months. In view of Li's behavior, how should company a and shareholders a protect the rights and interests of the company and themselves?
    • Voting rights can be restricted if shareholders fail to invest?2021-08-24
      In recent years, the competition for corporate control has become more and more intense. The form of competition is no longer confined to the background, but gradually moved to the stage. In order to fight for corporate control, the disputes about the representation of corporate will caused by the internal power struggle in commercial cases are increasing. Voting right has also become the focus of contention among shareholders. If they fail to fulfill the obligation of capital contribution on schedule, there are serious differences among shareholders about whether their voting right can be limited. In the absence of special provisions in the articles of association, should shareholders vote according to the proportion of paid in capital contribution or the proportion of subscribed capital contribution?
    • How to solve the deadlock caused by shareholders' contradiction?2021-07-27
      Party A, Party B and Party C established company a in 2008, holding 51%, 45% and 4% shares respectively. In 2018, due to policy adjustment, the main business of company a could not continue to operate. Party A, Party B and Party C held shareholders' meetings on the transformation and development direction of company a for many times, but Party A and Party B could not reach an agreement. Up to now, the development of the company has been stagnant, How can companies get out of trouble?
    About DOCVIT
    More
    Beijing Docvit Law Firm (Docvit in short), which was established in 2003, is one of the few earliest law firms instituted as a corporation rather than partnership in China. Aimed at building a high quality law firm with professional competence, Docvit fostered innovation under its unique system of operating as a large-scale corporation. Benefited with its core-competitiveness, such as international insights and full IT application management mode, to name some of them, Docvit pursued cross-border development and established an image of high-end brand in a industrialized market. In 2015, Docvit was ushered into a “3.0 era” of moderate-scale development, which witnessed the gradual formation of nation-wide and world-wide layout with the start-up of branch offices in Tianjin, Jinan, Shenzhen, Shanghai, Chengdu, Taiyuan, Hong Kong, London and other places in succession.
    Performance
    More
    Brand Activity
    More
    Honors
    More
    Over the years, business and brand of DOCVIT have matured and won the "Special Contribution Award of All China Lawyers Association", "Excellent Law Firm in Beijing", "Excellent Law Firm in Chaoyang District", ALB2016 Asia Top Ten Elite Law Firm, 2018 Outstanding Law Firm Award by China Business Law Journal, etc.