Interpretation of New NDRC Rules on Outbound Investment

Source:   Time: 2018-04-17 15:43:31  Author:

Abstract:

On December 26, 2017, the National Development and Reform Commission of China (the “NDRC”) officially published the “Administrative Measures for the Outbound Investment of Enterprises” (NDRC Order No. 11, hereinafter referred to as “Order No.11”) on its website. The New Rules shall be implemented on March 1, 2018. The existing Administrative Measures for Approval and Record Filing of Outbound Investment Projects (NDRC Order No. 9, hereinafter referred to as “Order No.9”), which was issued in May 2014, shall be repealed simultaneously. The Finance and Capital Market Team of Beijing Docvit Law Firm hereby presents a brief analysis of core clauses that have been modified by comparison with relevant previous regulations and impact on outbound investment made by domestic entities.

Order No. 11, containing 6 chapters and 66 articles, marks a significant step in the Chinese government’s continued efforts to build a comprehensive regulatory framework and strengthen supervision of outbound investments. Compared with Order No. 9, the Order No. 11 made several major changes in various aspects in conformity to the administrative reform of “Streamline Administration, Delegate Power, Strengthen Regulation and Improve Services” to further guide and regulate outbound investment.

A.Change in the scope of outbound investment supervision
a.Expand the scope of eligible investment subject
Order No.9 stipulates that all domestic legal entities shall qualify as eligible investment subject, while Order No.11 stipulates that domestic enterprises (financial and non-financial) shall comply with the New Rules; outbound investments made by non-enterprise organizations, such as public institutions and social associations, shall comply with the Order No.11.
In the light of the changes stated above, Order No. 11 obviously expanded the scope of eligible investment subject. For instance, partnership is considered to lack corporate personality, thus in theory need not to comply with Order No.9; but in practice still is subject to the requirements for obtaining approval/filing for record pursuant to rules similar to the current one. After the Order No.11 took effect, the eligibility of partnership as investment subject shall be ascertained.
Besides, the New Rules also expressly prescribe that outbound investments implemented by domestic financial enterprise are required to comply with the NDRC’s requirements under Order No. 11. In previous practice, the procedure of outbound investment made by financial enterprises could be interpreted differently. For instance, whether a financial enterprise need to file for record with the Commission of Development and Reform and Commission of Commerce after obtaining approval from relevant financial supervisory authority (CBRC, CSRC or CIRC) with regard to outbound investment projects; whether outbound investment of financial enterprises in overseas financial enterprises, non-financial enterprises and counterpart of non-financial enterprises in financial enterprises shall comply with Order No. 9. The Order No.11 made clear that outbound investment made by financial enterprises shall also seek approval or file for record with the NDRC in accordance with the New Rules. However, the implementation of such dual regulation module, as in how the approval procedures of NDRC and financial supervisory authority are connected and delimitation of powers and responsibilities of each authority, still need to be clarified.
b.Modify the scope of outbound investment projects subject to approval
The Order No. 11 also modified the scope of outbound investment projects that are subject to approval. Both the Order No. 9 and Order No. 11 stipulate that outbound investment projects involving sensitive countries & regions and sensitive industries shall seek approval from the NDRC; outbound investment projects not involving sensitive countries & regions and sensitive industries shall file for record with the NDRC before the implementation of the project. However, the scope of “sensitive countries & regions” and “sensitive industries” has been modified in the New Rule.
The Order No.11 retained the countries with no diplomatic relations with China, where war or civil unrest has broken out or in the scope of “sensitive countries & regions”, modified the “countries that are under international sanctions” stated in the Order No.9 to “countries in which investment by Chinese enterprises is restricted pursuant to China’s international treaties” and added the miscellaneous provision of “other sensitive countries and regions”.
The Order No.11 also modified the scope of “sensitive industries” defined in the previous rules. The exploitation or utilization of cross-border water resources and news media remained in the Catalogue, while the research into, or the production or maintenance of, weapons of war and other industries to be restricted according to relevant laws, regulations and macro-control policies in China were added. The New Rules explicitly expressed that the list of sensitive industries was to be set forth on a published schedule by the NDRC separately.
Please refer to the following table for projects that are subject to approval and recordation pursuant to the Order No. 11:



It should be noted that on August 4, 2017 the NDRC, MOFCOM, PBOC and MFA jointly issued the Guiding Opinions on Further Guiding and Regulating Outbound Investment Orientation (Guo Ban Fa [2017] No.74) (hereinafter referred to as the “Circular No. 74”). The guidance set out the outbound investments that are encouraged, restricted and prohibited. Compared with Circular No. 74, the scope of projects subject to approval stipulated under the Order No.11 does not coincide with that under Circular No. 74. For instance, the first three items in the restricted outbound investments (i.e. 1. Outbound investment in sensitive countries and regions, 2. Outbound investment in real estate, hotels, cinemas, entertainment, sports clubs and other specified restricted sectors, 3. Set up private equity funds or investment platforms without already having concrete projects planned for overseas) are subject to MOFCOM pre-approval. However, the Order No. 11 stipulated only sensitive projects need to obtain approval. In this regard, as the fourth type of sensitive industries is defined as “industries to be restricted from outbound investments according to laws, regulations and relevant macro-control policies”, we propose to interpret the items not expressly listed in the sensitive industries in the Order No.11, but ones which are set out in the second and third types of restricted investments need to obtain approval from the NDRC as well. It certainly remains to be ascertained in the further released list of sensitive industries or actual practice of the NDRC.
c. Expand the extent of investment
The Order No. 9 defined outbound investment as investment activities of domestic entities to obtain overseas ownership, operation and other business interests through investing certain assets and interests or providing guarantee, but did not give further specifications.
However, the Order No. 11 expressly lists out the specific circumstances in outbound investments, such as: domestic investors directly or through controlled overseas entities acquiring the ownership of, the right to use, and other rights and interests in land overseas; acquiring a concession to prospect or exploit and other rights and interests in overseas natural resources; acquiring the ownership of, the right of business management of, and other rights and interests in overseas infrastructure; acquiring the ownership of, the right of business management of, and other rights and interests in any overseas enterprise or asset; new construction, reconstruction, or expansion of overseas fixed assets; forming a new overseas enterprise or increasing investment in an existing overseas enterprise; and forming a new or acquiring a non-controlling stake in an overseas equity investment fund. Besides, even domestic investors do not engaged in cross-border capital flow or equity change, investment activities of controlling overseas enterprise or asset by an agreement, a trust, or any other means shall be considered outbound investment under the Order No. 11.
In the meantime, the Order No. 11 also explicitly defines the concept of “control”. “Control” is broadly defined as holding, directly or indirectly, 50% or more of voting rights of an entity, or being able to direct the operations, finance, personnel, technology, or other important matters of such entity. Thus, outbound investments conducted by domestic investors as the investing entity, or through their overseas enterprises (regardless of whether or not the domestic investor actually obtains the interests of the overseas enterprise (such as equity)) shall comply with the Order No.11. 
d.Supervision on Natural Person’s Outbound Investment
Under the Order No.9, outbound investments conducted by natural persons shall be governed by specific administrative measures separately enacted. As no such administrative measures have been issued by the NDRC. To date, only the regulations of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on foreign exchange administration for domestic residents to engage in financing and in return investment via Overseas SPVs shall apply with outbound investment made by natural persons.
Under the Order No. 11, outbound investments conducted by domestic natural persons through their controlled overseas enterprises or Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan entities shall comply with the New Rules, although outbound investments conducted directly by domestic natural persons are not within the scope of supervision.



B.Streamlining and Improvement in Procedure
a.Abolish the "project information report" regime
Under the Order No. 9, domestic companies which invest USD $300 million or more in any outbound M&A or bidding project, shall submit a project information report to, and obtain a confirmation letter (also known as the "Road Pass") from, the NDRC before conducting any substantive work abroad (i.e., entering into a binding agreement, submitting a binding offer or filing an application with the regulators in the host jurisdiction).
The New Rules repeal the "Road Pass" requirement to streamline the administrative procedure and to reduce institutional transaction costs.
b.Push back the deadline for completing the approval or record filing process
The previous rules require that domestic investors shall obtain an approval document or filing notice from the NDRC before the signing of a binding agreement in any outbound investment project that is subject to the NDRC's approval or record filing requirement, unless the investment agreement expressly states that the completion of the approval or record filing process is a condition of the effectiveness of the investment agreement.
The Order No. 11 extends the deadline for obtaining the approval document or filing notice to "before the implementation of the investment", i.e. closing of the transaction. It prescribes that such government approval or filing notice will not be required until the domestic investors or the offshore entities controlled by them start to contribute assets or interests or to provide finance or security to overseas projects. This will enable domestic buyers to set obtaining government approvals or filing records as a condition to closing the transaction, which is consistent with international best practice.
c.Simplify the submission process
According to the previous rules, if any domestic investor (excluding enterprises managed by the central government) conduct an outbound investment project that is subject to the NDRC's approval or record filing process, the application documents should first be filed with the provincial-level NDRC, and the provincial-level NDRC shall review the application and then further submit it to the NDRC along with its review opinion.
The New Rules allow non-SOE domestic investors to submit such application documents to the NDRC directly through the "management and service network system of outbound investment" established by the NDRC, which will speed up the administrative procedure and bring more certainty to the NDRC's approval or recording filing process.
Extended period of validity of approvals or filing documents.The NDRC's approval document or filing notice under Order No. 9 is normally valid for two years in the case of construction projects and one year for other outbound investment projects. The New Rules extend the validity of an issued approval document or completed filing notice to two years for all OUTBOUND INVESTMENT projects. This will give domestic investors more flexibility to implement their overseas investments. In addition to the major changes listed above, the New Rules also expressly prescribe that outbound investments implemented by domestic financial enterprise are required to comply with the NDRC's requirements under Order No. 11.


C.Strengthening Overall Supervision
Significant adverse event report. When an outbound investment project, whether undertaken by a domestic investor or a controlled foreign entity, experiences a significant adverse event (such as significant injury or death of employees, significant asset losses, or harm to China’s foreign relations with the related country), the New Rules require the Domestic investor to report such event to NDRC within five business days thereof.
Closing report. The New Rules also require outbound investors, in all projects that undergo record-filing or verification and approval, to submit a closing report within 20 business days following the closing of such projects.
Liability for investors and financial institutions, including their responsible persons. The New Rules provide that outbound investors and their “responsible persons” will face penalties and potentially criminal liability for “malicious” inaccuracies in applying for approval, obtaining an approval or record-filing notice through fraud or bribery, engaging in projects without an approval or record-filing notice (when required), failing to provide required reports, unfair competition, or harming national security. In addition, financial institutions and their responsible persons may, based on consultations with applicable regulators, be punished for providing financing or a guarantees to projects prior such projects completing record filing and approval (when such procedures are required).
New supervisory tools. The New Rules instruct NDRC and its provincial counterparts to establish new means to supervise outbound investment, including online supervision, face-to-face meetings, written inquiries, and random verification.


D.Conclusion
In general, the Order No. 11 cancelled and streamlined the previous procedures that were not in conformity with international practice, added provisions to facilitate outbound investments and satisfied the evolving need of domestic entities in overseas investment. 
However, the Order No. 11 has overall strengthened regulation instead of relaxed it. In accordance with current practice, the NDRC theoretically administers recordation on non-sensitive projects, but in fact undertakes the substantive examination rather than formality examination. As the Order No. 11 has reserved the full direction for the NDRC, impact of the New Rules on future outbound investment activities remains to be seen.

May be interested

Professional Team
Industry Research
More
  • Legal Health Index Report on National Private Equity Industry
    The purpose of this report is to provide insights into legislation, regulation, and justice in the form of private equity industry indices. As the first legal cross-border alliance which takes the law as the core element, research institute as the support, the Internet as the platform, and the internationalization as the vision, Green Legal Global Alliance (GLGA) has been concerned about the ways in which legislation, regulation and justice will affect the private placement industry. Up to now, the volume of private equity funds has grown to the same level as public funds, and its development speed is so rapid.
  • Legal Health Index Report on Listed Companies among Central SOE (A-shares)
    Legal Health Index Report on Listed Companies among Central SOE (A-shares) is the first index report on the health development of listed companies among central SOE (A-shares) in the market with legal health-oriented and judging criteria. It is the first index report on listed companies among central SOE (A-shares) with public welfare and academic nature launched by a third party, and it is an innovative measure for researching and evaluating the listed companies among central enterprises (A-shares) as a new perspective.
  • 2018 Blue Book of China's Non-Performing Assets
    Based on an in-depth study and research on the overall non-performing asset industry, Green Legal Global Alliance Research Institute and Beijing Docvit Law Firm jointly complied 2018 Blue Book of China's Non-Performing Assets with certain academic and public welfare, hoping to bring guidance to the industry and reflect the innovation of the non-performing asset industry itself.
Fellow Program
More
  • 【Fellow Program I】
    With the launch of the "Fellow Program", Docvit hopes to unite with the like-minded lawyers of the country to build a career platform and realize their career dreams together. "Fellow Program I" aims to recruit partners, business partners and executive directors for the Docvit Branch in China.
  • 【Fellow Program II】
    "Fellow Program II" aims to recruit partners and lawyers for Docvit Headquarters and Beijing Office across the country and around the world to become what the industry, Docvit itself, market and clients want.
  • 【Fellow Program III】
    "Fellow Program III" aims to recruit partners for national branches of Docvit nationwide and globally. Docvit's national and global development blueprints require more partners to draw together, and let us work together to create a respectable law firm.
Brand Activity
More