Who shall pay when lease is deemed invalid?

Source: Beijing Docvit Law Firm  Time: 2019-03-08 10:28:02  Author: Docvit

Abstract: Plaintiff (hereafter as P) lent the Defendant (hereafter as D) a factory. After signed the lease, D furnished the factory then started the operation. Later, said factory was included in the area of eminent domain, D is forced to stop producing and move out. D believes that since the production is paused due to eminent domain, D shall not bear rent during the move. P sued and request for rent. D raises a counterclaim asking P for cost of furnish. The court held that: "The lease over the illegal property shall be invalid. Since the concerned factory is on collective owned land and the building itself never be listed in the zoning plan, thus the building itself is unlicensed." Which leads to an issue, when the lease is deemed invalid, how does the lessor and the lessee bear the responsibility?

D should move out the building and pay the occupation charges. According the contract law, after a contract becomes invalid or is rescinded, any property obtained under the contract shall be returned. If it is impracticable or unnecessary to return the property, compensation shall be made at a price converted from the property. In this case, the lease in deemed invalid, thus the lease shall return the property while the pay the occupancy charges.

The P is main liable and D is secondary liable. The party at fault shall compensate the other party for the resulting loss. If both parties are at fault, they shall bear their respective liabilities.

The P knowingly rent an unlicensed building to D, which makes him bear the major liability for the invalid contract. Contract article 126, The lessor shall deliver the leased item to the lessee as pre-agreed, and maintain the leased item fit for the contracted purposes during the lease term.in this scenario, the P rent the building out knowing that the building violates the zoning ordinance, leads to the invalidity of the lease. The fault is on the leasor, thus he is liable.

When the defendant signed the contract, he did not the reasonably review and should bear the secondary liabilities. The lease should perform the duty of care when sign the lease. Lack the duty of care or sign the lease knowing the property is unlicensed, the leasee is also at fault thus

Bear costs.

The loss occurred from the invalidity of contract, include direct loss and indirect loss. When the contract is invalid and both party is liable for the invalidity, if loss occurs to one party, then both party should bear the liability according the degree of fault. The losses should limited to the ones pertinent to the lease but not the foreseeable ones.

In the dispute arising in lease, the direct loss is usually the restoration fee on fixing up the damages lease caused due to the unauthorized decoration. The usual indirect loss is due to the reliance on the lease, the lease’s cost for decoration.

The court hold that for the counterclaim for his cost incurred from the decoration, considering the fault on both party, the actual losses incurred to you and the performance of the contract, P shall bear 90% of the decoration costs.  

In conclusion, in this case, the P lent the unlicensed building to D, thus is mainly liable for the invalidity of the contract. D didn’t perform thorough review therefore shall bear the secondary liability for the invalidity. Due to the invalidity, the leasee shall return the property and pay the occupancy charges, while leasor shall pay compensate the loss incurred by leasee’s reliance, which is, in this case, the decoration costs.  

May be interested

Professional Team
Industry Research
More
  • Legal Health Index Report on National Insurance Industry (2015 - 2017)
    Legal Health Index Report on National Insurance Industry (2015 - 2017) is compiled by Green Legal Global Alliance (GLGA), with the Beijing Docvit Law Firm as the professional support unit. Under the guidance of an external team of experts, it is one of the series of research topics in the legal health index report of capital market industry. In 2017, Green Legal Global Alliance (GLGA) successfully released its first research achievement of the series of research projects in the legal health index report on capital market industry, that is the Legal Health Index Report on Private Equity Industry. Report on Insurance Industry Legal Health Index is the second research result of this research topic.
  • 2018 Blue Book of China's Non-Performing Assets
    Based on an in-depth study and research on the overall non-performing asset industry, Green Legal Global Alliance Research Institute and Beijing Docvit Law Firm jointly complied 2018 Blue Book of China's Non-Performing Assets with certain academic and public welfare, hoping to bring guidance to the industry and reflect the innovation of the non-performing asset industry itself.
  • Legal Health Index Report on National Private Equity Industry
    The purpose of this report is to provide insights into legislation, regulation, and justice in the form of private equity industry indices. As the first legal cross-border alliance which takes the law as the core element, research institute as the support, the Internet as the platform, and the internationalization as the vision, Green Legal Global Alliance (GLGA) has been concerned about the ways in which legislation, regulation and justice will affect the private placement industry. Up to now, the volume of private equity funds has grown to the same level as public funds, and its development speed is so rapid.
Fellow Program
More
  • 【Fellow Program I】
    With the launch of the "Fellow Program", Docvit hopes to unite with the like-minded lawyers of the country to build a career platform and realize their career dreams together. "Fellow Program I" aims to recruit partners, business partners and executive directors for the Docvit Branch in China.
  • 【Fellow Program II】
    "Fellow Program II" aims to recruit partners and lawyers for Docvit Headquarters and Beijing Office across the country and around the world to become what the industry, Docvit itself, market and clients want.
  • 【Fellow Program III】
    "Fellow Program III" aims to recruit partners for national branches of Docvit nationwide and globally. Docvit's national and global development blueprints require more partners to draw together, and let us work together to create a respectable law firm.
Brand Activity
More